Some producers violate the standards of production and offer products of low quality. Those are the kinds of producers you should avoid. And we will give you a list of those producers.
You deserve to know all the information about the GMO products that brought dangers. These products have harmful effects and they are spread in every place on Earth.
Scientists have confirmed that GMO products are dangerous because they can cause diseases like allergies, infertility, and even cancer.
5 Brands That Use 100% GMO in Their Products
Avoid the following five companies that have GMOs in their products.
1. Nestle.
The company of Nestle uses GMOs in foods for babies. What else do you need to know? This company removed GMOs from baby food when the public forced it to do that in South Africa and still sells its products in the American version of the company.
2. Hershey’s.
This company donated 800,000 dollars to defeat California’s Prop 37 and Washington I-522 to label GMO products. Do you still want to eat these chocolates? This company of Hershey gave also plus 500,000 dollars to defeat the anti-GMO initiative of this year in Colorado and Oregon. The only organic brand that the company is Dagoba.
3. Pepsi.
The consumers of Pepsi were irritated when the hidden GMO element was found in the product. Because of this, the Pepsi Company needed to pay 9 million dollars for the lawsuit that was filed about false advertising. Their Naked juice that they claimed is 100% natural; actually, it was full of GMOs.
4. General Mills.
The General Mills representatives stated that they do not add ingredients that are GMO oats in their products. They say that they use a little non-GMO cornstarch in the process of cooking and a little pure canned sugar while serving. This is considered to be a lie. The truth is that 2% of the company is affected by GMO prohibition.
5. Kellogg’s.
This company stated that their products are 100% natural without artificial additives, but some researchers proved the opposite. Kellogg’s mueslis has 100% GMO corn in the content. This is the reason why the company paid 5 million dollars for a lawsuit.
